Fire Safety & RIDDOR Reporting for Care Homes

Fire Safety and RIDDOR Reporting for Care Homes: What Registered Managers Need to Know

Two separate regulatory systems, two separate responsible bodies, and two sets of paperwork that CQC will still expect to see evidence of during an inspection.

📅 Published September 2026
🕐 10 min read
Updated
✍️ CQCLogic Team

Fire safety and RIDDOR reporting sit outside CQC’s direct enforcement remit, which is exactly why they catch some Registered Managers out — it’s easy to assume that because CQC doesn’t enforce these rules directly, they’re somehow less important to the inspection. In practice, both feed directly into how safe your service looks under the Safe key question, and the HSE’s own RIDDOR guidance for health and social care is the authoritative source both systems ultimately answer to.

Fire Safety: Who’s Responsible, and For What

Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, every care home has a “responsible person” — usually the registered provider or a nominated individual such as the Registered Manager — who is legally accountable for fire safety, not the local fire and rescue authority.

  • A suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment must be carried out and kept under regular review
  • Most homes review at least annually, and always after a material change: a layout alteration, a new resident with reduced mobility, or following any fire-related incident
  • Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) are needed for residents who would need assistance to evacuate
  • Staff fire training needs to be current, not just completed once at induction

A common gap

A fire risk assessment that hasn’t been updated since the resident population changed significantly — more residents with mobility needs, more residents living with dementia who may not respond predictably to alarms — is one of the most common findings when fire safety gets scrutinised, even if the original assessment was thorough.

What a Usable PEEP Record Actually Contains

A Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan that just says a resident “may need assistance” gives night staff almost nothing to act on in an actual emergency. The same specificity gap that undermines capacity assessments and safeguarding referrals shows up here too.

✗ Vague — avoid this

“Resident has mobility issues and may need help to evacuate.”

✓ Specific — use this

“Resident uses a wheelchair, cannot use stairs unaided. Requires two staff and evac chair from Room 12 to Assembly Point B. Reviewed 1 Sept, next review 1 Dec or on mobility change.”

RIDDOR: What Actually Needs Reporting

RIDDOR — the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations — requires reporting of work-related deaths, certain serious injuries, specified occupational diseases, and dangerous occurrences, to the Health and Safety Executive.

  • Serious injuries to staff arising from work activities are the main focus of RIDDOR in a care setting
  • Injuries to residents receiving care are generally handled through safeguarding referrals and CQC notifications instead, not RIDDOR — a distinction that trips up many providers
  • Certain dangerous occurrences, including some fires and structural failures, are reportable even without an injury

RIDDOR Reporting Timescales

Timing matters as much as classification, and it is one of the most common practical errors: a report made correctly but too late is still a compliance failure.

  • Work-related deaths and specified major injuries: report without delay, followed by a written report within 10 days
  • Injuries causing more than 7 consecutive days’ incapacity (excluding the day of the incident): report within 15 days of the accident
  • Dangerous occurrences: report without delay, using the same standard as major injuries
  • Occupational diseases: report as soon as a doctor’s diagnosis is received

Where CQC Fits In

CQC does not enforce fire safety or RIDDOR directly — the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order sits with the local fire and rescue authority, and RIDDOR sits with the Health and Safety Executive. But inspectors do factor both into the Safe key question, and will typically expect to see a current fire risk assessment, evidence of up-to-date fire training, PEEPs for residents who need them, and a clear system for recording and learning from incidents — regardless of which regulator technically owns the underlying rule.

Bringing safety evidence into one place

If fire safety, health and safety, or incident-recording gaps have contributed to an inspection finding, CQCLogic structures the improvement plan around the specific regulation and evidence CQC expects at reinspection — see a real sample plan or view pricing.

Summary: What Every Fire Safety and RIDDOR System Must Include

  1. A current fire risk assessment, reviewed at least annually and after any material change
  2. A named responsible person under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
  3. Specific, individual PEEPs for every resident who needs evacuation assistance
  4. Fire training records that are current, not just completed at induction
  5. A clear internal test for what counts as RIDDOR-reportable versus safeguarding/CQC-notifiable
  6. RIDDOR reports submitted within the correct statutory timescale for the incident type
  7. A system for recording and learning from near-misses, not just reportable incidents
  8. Evidence both systems are reviewed together as part of wider Safe key question governance

Frequently Asked Questions

How often does a care home need a fire risk assessment?

There is no fixed legal interval, but a fire risk assessment must be “suitable and sufficient” and kept under regular review under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. In practice, most care homes review annually as a minimum, and always after any material change — a layout change, a new resident with reduced mobility, or after a fire safety incident.

What incidents must be reported under RIDDOR?

RIDDOR (the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations) requires reporting of work-related deaths, specified serious injuries, occupational diseases, and dangerous occurrences. In a care setting this typically includes serious injuries to staff (not generally injuries to residents receiving care, which are usually handled through safeguarding and CQC notification routes instead) and certain dangerous occurrences such as some fires.

Who is responsible for fire safety in a care home?

The “responsible person” under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 is usually the employer or building owner/manager — in most care homes, this is the registered provider or a nominated individual such as the Registered Manager. This person is legally accountable for ensuring a suitable fire risk assessment is carried out and acted upon.

Does CQC check fire safety directly?

CQC does not enforce fire safety law directly — that sits with the local fire and rescue authority — but inspectors do consider fire safety as part of the Safe key question, and will expect to see a current fire risk assessment, evidence of staff fire training, and personal emergency evacuation plans (PEEPs) for residents who need them.

How quickly must a RIDDOR report be submitted?

A work-related death or specified major injury must be reported to the HSE without delay, and followed up with a written report within 10 days. An injury causing more than seven consecutive days’ incapacity (excluding the day of the incident) must be reported within 15 days of the accident. Dangerous occurrences follow the same without-delay standard as major injuries.