CQC Mock Inspection Template: Free Checklist, Scoring Sheet and Action Plan for Care Homes and Home Care
A complete, copy-and-print mock inspection template: setup sheet, CQC-style scoring, a check for every one of the 34 quality statements, a walk-round observation list, record sampling guide and an action plan.
A CQC mock inspection template is a structured form you use to test your own service the way CQC would: it covers the five key questions and 34 quality statements, lists what to check and what evidence to look at, records a score and turns gaps into an action plan. This page gives you the full template to copy into Word or Excel, or to print. It scores each quality statement from 1 to 4, as CQC does, and shows you how to turn the totals into a percentage and a likely rating per key question. A mock inspection is an internal exercise and does not replace or predict a CQC assessment, but it is the best way to find gaps first.
This template is for registered managers, nominated individuals and quality leads in care homes and home care (domiciliary care) agencies in England. The structure and scoring follow CQC’s published method. The questions, sampling sizes and guidance are our practical suggestions, not CQC requirements, and we say so. Facts about CQC come from its guidance, linked in the sources section.
Download the template
Excel version (.xlsx): one sheet per key question, a 1 to 4 score column, and a summary sheet that totals each key question, shows the percentage, applies the limiter rules for scores of 1 and 2, and shows the likely rating band.
Word version (.docx): the same checklists, walk-round list, sampling guide and action plan, ready to print and fill in by hand.
You can also copy each table below into your own document, or print the page to PDF. Fill in the score and notes columns as you go, then transfer actions to the action plan. For staff question prompts see our mock inspection questions, and for the wider routine see how to pass a CQC inspection.
Key takeaways
- Run the mock as CQC would: documents, observation, conversations with people and staff, then score and agree actions.
- Score each quality statement 1 to 4, then add them up per key question. A key question is Good at 63% or more of the maximum.
- Any quality statement scored 1 limits a Good result to Requires Improvement, so look for 1s first.
- Use someone independent of the area being checked, and score on evidence you have seen, not on policy or intention.
- A mock inspection is an internal exercise. It does not replace or predict a CQC assessment.
In this guide
- Step 1: Mock inspection set-up sheet
- Step 2: Scoring method (CQC-style)
- Step 3: Safe (8 quality statements)
- Step 4: Effective (6 quality statements)
- Step 5: Caring (5 quality statements)
- Step 6: Responsive (7 quality statements)
- Step 7: Well-led (8 quality statements)
- Step 8: Summary scoring sheet
- Walk-round observation checklist (our suggestion)
- Records sampling guide (our suggestion)
- People and staff conversations
- Step 9: Action plan template
- Step 10: Debrief and repeat
- Adapting the template for home care
- How much does a mock inspection cost?
- Mock inspection versus a real CQC assessment
- Sources and how this was checked
- Mock inspection report template
- Frequently asked questions
Step 1: Mock inspection set-up sheet
Complete this before you start. It makes the exercise repeatable and gives you a baseline to compare with next time.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Service name and location ID | |
| Service type (care home, nursing home, supported living, home care) | |
| Date and time of the mock inspection | |
| Mock inspector(s) and their role | |
| Independent of the areas checked? (yes or no) | |
| Announced or unannounced to staff | |
| Scope (all five key questions, or selected) | |
| Latest CQC rating and date; open actions from the last report | |
| Notes from the previous mock inspection |
Tip (ours): use a mock inspector who does not manage the area, for example a manager from another service, a trusted colleague or an external consultant. People tend to score their own work generously.
Step 2: Scoring method (CQC-style)
CQC gives each quality statement it assesses a score from 1 to 4, using professional judgement on the evidence: 1 means significant shortfalls, 2 some shortfalls, 3 a good standard and 4 an exceptional standard. It then adds the scores for a key question and divides by the maximum possible, which is the number of quality statements multiplied by 4. The percentage is translated into a rating using these thresholds (CQC: How we reach a rating):
| Key question score | Rating |
|---|---|
| 88% and above | Outstanding |
| 63% to 87% | Good |
| 39% to 62% | Requires Improvement |
| 25% to 38% | Inadequate |
Two rules stop poor areas being hidden. If the key question score is in the Good range but one or more quality statements scored 1, the rating is limited to Requires Improvement. If it is in the Outstanding range but one or more scored 1 or 2, it is limited to Good. For the overall rating, CQC weights the five key questions equally and the overall rating is normally Good when no key question is Inadequate and no more than one is Requires Improvement.
Totals you need for each key question
| Key question | Quality statements | Maximum score | Total for Good (63%) | Total for Outstanding (88%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safe | 8 | 32 | 21 or more | 29 or more |
| Effective | 6 | 24 | 16 or more | 22 or more |
| Caring | 5 | 20 | 13 or more | 18 or more |
| Responsive | 7 | 28 | 18 or more | 25 or more |
| Well-led | 8 | 32 | 21 or more | 29 or more |
These are the lowest whole-number totals that reach each threshold. Remember the limiter: even with enough points, any score of 1 holds Good back to Requires Improvement. Use the scores to compare over time and to find priorities, not as a forecast of your CQC rating.
Our score guide for mock inspectors (a suggestion)
| Score | Meaning | Typical evidence picture |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Exceptional | Consistent, evidenced excellence; people and staff describe it unprompted; improvements are embedded and learning is shared |
| 3 | Good standard | Records, observation and conversations agree; audits find issues and actions are closed on time |
| 2 | Some shortfalls | Gaps in records or practice; actions open or late; staff or records inconsistent |
| 1 | Significant shortfalls | Risk to people, or no evidence; processes missing or not followed |
Step 3: Safe (8 quality statements)
| Quality statement | What to check | Evidence to see | Score 1 to 4 | Notes and actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning culture | Incidents, near misses and events are reported, investigated and learned from; duty of candour followed | Incident log with actions closed; examples of changes made; duty of candour records | ||
| Safe systems, pathways and transitions | Safe referral, transfer and admission arrangements; information shared with other services | Care records, referral and transfer records, multidisciplinary team notes | ||
| Safeguarding | Staff know how to spot and report abuse; referrals made and followed up; MCA and DoLS understood | Safeguarding log and referrals; training records; DoLS and capacity records; staff conversations | ||
| Involving people to manage risks | Risk assessments are personal, current and agreed with people; restrictive practice is recorded and reviewed | Risk assessments reviewed after changes; restrictive practice records; people’s views recorded | ||
| Safe environments | Premises, equipment and emergency plans are safe and maintained | Fire, water, gas, electrical and equipment checks; risk assessments; business continuity plan | ||
| Safe and effective staffing | Enough competent staff; safe recruitment; supervision and appraisal in place | Rotas against need; recruitment files (DBS, references); training matrix; supervision and competency records; turnover and vacancy data | ||
| Infection prevention and control | Policy, audits and action plans; cleanliness; staff practice matches policy | IPC audits with actions; cleaning schedules; observation of PPE, hand hygiene and laundry | ||
| Medicines optimisation | Medicines are ordered, stored, given and recorded safely, including PRN; errors are learned from | MAR charts with no gaps; PRN protocols; storage and temperature records; medicines audits and actions |
Step 4: Effective (6 quality statements)
| Quality statement | What to check | Evidence to see | Score 1 to 4 | Notes and actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessing needs | Needs, preferences and protected characteristics are assessed and recorded; mental capacity is considered | Pre-admission assessments; care plans; best interest decisions; pain and risk tools | ||
| Delivering evidence-based care and treatment | Care follows current guidance; nutrition and hydration are monitored | Care plans; food and fluid charts; quality improvement activity | ||
| How staff, teams and services work together | Staff work with GPs, nurses and other professionals; advice is followed and recorded | Professional visit records; multidisciplinary notes; handover records; partner feedback | ||
| Supporting people to live healthier lives | Health needs, screening and activity are supported | Health check and screening records; activity plans; hospital passports | ||
| Monitoring and improving outcomes | Outcomes are tracked and acted on | Care records; provider-led audits and actions; outcome measures such as falls and weights | ||
| Consent to care and treatment | Consent is sought and recorded; best interests process is followed when capacity is lacking | Consent records; capacity assessments; best interest meetings; power of attorney evidence; consent policy |
Step 5: Caring (5 quality statements)
| Quality statement | What to check | Evidence to see | Score 1 to 4 | Notes and actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindness, compassion and dignity | Staff are kind, respectful and protect privacy | Observation of interactions; what people and relatives say; compliments and complaints | ||
| Treating people as individuals | Care reflects people’s history, culture and preferences | Care plans; observation; conversations with people; life story records | ||
| Independence, choice and control | People make their own choices and are helped to stay independent | Care plans; observation of choice at mealtimes and routines; records of decisions | ||
| Responding to people’s immediate needs | Staff respond quickly and calmly to distress, pain and requests | Observation; call bell response data; people’s comments | ||
| Workforce wellbeing and enablement | Staff safety, wellbeing and support are monitored | Sickness, vacancy and turnover data; staff survey; wellbeing support records; management policies |
Step 6: Responsive (7 quality statements)
| Quality statement | What to check | Evidence to see | Score 1 to 4 | Notes and actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person-centred care | Care is planned around the person and reviewed with them | Care plans and reviews; observation; people’s and families’ views | ||
| Care provision, integration and continuity | Care continues smoothly when needs change or people move | Care records; continuity arrangements; partner feedback | ||
| Providing information | Information is accessible, fees are explained and communication needs are met | Accessible information records; fee information; communication preferences in plans | ||
| Listening to and involving people | Feedback and complaints are welcomed, acted on and shared | Complaints log with outcomes; feedback and actions; advocacy records; residents’ meetings | ||
| Equity in access | People can access the service and premises fairly | Accessibility risk assessments; admission records; audits | ||
| Equity in experience and outcomes | Differences in experience and outcomes between groups are checked and acted on | Care records; improvement plans and audits | ||
| Planning for the future | End of life and future care wishes are recorded and respected | DNACPR and ReSPECT records; end of life care plans; family feedback |
Step 7: Well-led (8 quality statements)
| Quality statement | What to check | Evidence to see | Score 1 to 4 | Notes and actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared direction and culture | Vision, values and strategy are known and lived; culture is open | Vision and values; business plan; staff and family feedback on culture; objectives monitoring | ||
| Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders | Leaders have the skills and integrity to lead; fit and proper person checks are complete | Fit and proper person evidence; leadership training; registered manager status; induction records | ||
| Freedom to speak up | Staff feel safe to raise concerns and see action | Whistleblowing records; mechanisms for staff feedback; staff survey; conversations | ||
| Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion | Staff are treated fairly and equally; reasonable adjustments are made | EDI policy and training; flexible working; reasonable adjustments; records of incidents towards staff; action plans | ||
| Governance and assurance | Roles, risks and quality are managed through effective governance | Audit schedule and results; governance minutes and action log; risk register; business continuity plan; data protection arrangements; workforce planning | ||
| Partnership and communities | The service works well with others and its community | Partner feedback; records of collaboration; shared learning | ||
| Learning, improvement and innovation | Learning is embedded and improvement is continuous | Improvement plan; evidence of embedded change; learning from incidents and audits | ||
| Environmental sustainability | The service understands and manages its environmental impact (CQC lists no example evidence for care homes or home care) | Where relevant, an environmental policy or plan |
Step 8: Summary scoring sheet
Add up the scores for each key question, divide by the maximum and compare with the thresholds. Note any quality statement scored 1.
| Key question | Total score | Maximum | Percentage | Any score of 1? | Likely rating band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safe | 32 | ||||
| Effective | 24 | ||||
| Caring | 20 | ||||
| Responsive | 28 | ||||
| Well-led | 32 |
Formula: total score divided by maximum, multiplied by 100. Example: Safe total 24 out of 32 is 75%, which is in the Good range provided no quality statement scored 1.
Walk-round observation checklist (our suggestion)
CQC’s observation evidence covers how staff deliver care, staff culture and behaviours, the care environment and equipment. Walk the service at different times, including a mealtime and a medicines round, and tick or note each item.
| Area | What to look and listen for | Seen? Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Arrival and first impressions | Welcome, rating displayed, visitors’ arrangements, smell, noise, atmosphere | |
| Interactions | Staff speak respectfully, offer choice, explain what they are doing, respond quickly to calls | |
| Dignity and privacy | Doors closed, personal care private, confidentiality of records and handovers | |
| Mealtimes | Choice, support, hydration, pace, textures and special diets followed | |
| Medicines round | Safe practice, identity checks, no interruptions, records completed at the time | |
| Environment | Clean, safe, free from hazards; fire doors and exits clear; call bells reachable | |
| Equipment | Checked, serviced and in date; hoists and slings fit for use | |
| Infection control | PPE, hand hygiene, laundry, sluice, cleaning schedules followed | |
| Records in use | Notes completed promptly; care plans where staff can use them | |
| Activities and engagement | People occupied in line with their plans and preferences |
Records sampling guide (our suggestion)
CQC does not set sample sizes. These starting points give a fair view without taking a day each: increase them where you find problems.
| Record | Suggested sample | What to test |
|---|---|---|
| Care plans and risk assessments | 5 people, including a recent admission and someone with complex needs | Current, personal, reviewed after changes, consistent with daily notes |
| Medicines (MAR charts) | One full month for 5 people, plus PRN protocols | No unexplained gaps, stock matches records, errors reported |
| Staff files | 5 staff including newest starters | DBS, references, identity, training, supervision, competency |
| Incidents and safeguarding | All from the last 3 months | Reported, escalated, notified, learned from, actions closed |
| Complaints and feedback | All from the last 6 months | Acknowledged, investigated, outcomes shared, learning applied |
| Audits and governance | Last 3 audits and governance minutes | Findings turned into dated actions and closed |
| Rotas and staffing | 4 weeks | Planned against actual, agency use, skill mix, dependency |
People and staff conversations
Speak to people who use the service and relatives, and to staff across roles. Keep it conversational and note examples, not scripted answers. Our mock inspection questions give prompts for each key question, and how to prepare staff explains how to brief a team without coaching.
| Who | How many (suggestion) | Cover |
|---|---|---|
| People who use the service | 3 to 5, including someone with limited communication | Safety, kindness, choice, food, activities, whether concerns are listened to |
| Relatives or visitors | 2 to 3 | Communication, involvement in care, how concerns are handled |
| Care and support staff | 4 to 6 across shifts | Safeguarding, medicines, training, supervision, staffing, speaking up |
| Senior staff and nurses | 2 | Oversight, escalation, delegation, record checks |
| Registered manager and provider | 1 each | Governance, audits, risk, learning, notifications |
Step 9: Action plan template
List every quality statement scored 1 or 2, and any 3 where the evidence is thin. Give each action one owner and a date.
| Finding | Quality statement | Score | Priority | Action | Owner | Due date | Evidence of completion | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example: three MAR charts had unexplained gaps | Medicines optimisation | 2 | High | Audit all MARs weekly for a month; retrain on recording; senior checks each shift | Deputy manager | 14 days | Weekly audit results; training sign-off | Open |
See our action plan template and how to write an improvement plan for more detail.
Step 10: Debrief and repeat
- Hold a short debrief with the team the same day: what went well, what needs attention, and the top three priorities.
- Share the result openly. Staff should see the findings and their part in the actions.
- Finish the action plan within a week and add dates to the calendar.
- Re-check scored 1s and 2s within a month.
- Repeat the exercise regularly. Quarterly for the full template, with monthly spot checks in your weaker areas, is a practical rhythm (our suggestion).
Adapting the template for home care
The key questions and scoring are the same. For home care, shift the evidence checks as CQC’s home care evidence list does (CQC: Homecare and shared lives evidence categories): add environmental and health and safety risk assessments for people’s homes, arrangements to respond to emergencies, appraisal and supervision records, staffing and skill mix records, and PRN protocols. Replace the walk-round with visit observation (a spot check of a care visit with the person’s agreement), check call and visit records, daily notes and call monitoring, and sample lone-working arrangements.
How much does a mock inspection cost?
A mock inspection you run yourself with this template costs staff time only. External mock inspections are priced by providers according to the size and complexity of the service, and published prices vary widely, so ask for a written scope and price. For a sense of range, one provider was advertising a downloadable mock inspection toolkit and action plan at £400 plus VAT in October 2026, which is a self-completion product, not a site visit. Compare what is included: on-site days, interviews, scoring, a written report and a follow-up visit.
Mock inspection versus a real CQC assessment
A mock inspection is an internal preparedness exercise. It does not replicate or replace an official CQC assessment, and your own scores will not match CQC’s because CQC applies professional judgement across evidence categories you cannot fully see, including information from partners and the public (CQC: Planning assessments). Use the template to find and fix gaps, not to predict a rating. See what evidence CQC inspectors look for for the lists CQC publishes.
Sources and how this was checked
- CQC: How we reach a rating (page last updated 13 May 2025; scoring from 2 December 2024).
- CQC: Care homes and supported living services: evidence categories and Homecare and shared lives services: evidence categories.
- CQC: Planning assessments (page last updated 8 January 2026).
Read on 23 October 2026. The questions, sampling sizes, score guide and timings are our suggestions, not CQC guidance.
Turn mock inspection findings into tracked actions
CQCLogic keeps your improvement actions, owners, deadlines and evidence in one task list, so mock inspection findings do not get lost and you can show what changed. It tracks your work; it does not submit anything to CQC. See a sample improvement plan, view pricing or get started free.
Mock Inspection Report Template: How to Write Up Your Findings
People search for a “CQC inspection report template” meaning two different things. CQC does not publish a blank report template for providers: it writes its own reports, and says each one is written by the lead inspector. What providers can use is the structure of a real CQC report as a model for the report that comes out of a mock inspection. CQC says its adult social care reports include:
- contextual information about the service and the inspection;
- a description of the inspection team’s findings;
- ratings for each key question inspected and the overall rating;
- evidence about any breaches of the regulations, the action CQC told the provider to take, and any enforcement action;
- recommendations to the provider about improvements;
- a summary section for the provider to share with each person using the service, their family and carers, and staff.
Where needed, CQC also prepares easy read report summaries for people with a learning disability. (Source: CQC, The inspection report: adult social care services.) A mock report that follows the same shape makes your findings easy to compare with a real one. Our suggested template:
| Section | What to write |
|---|---|
| 1. About this mock inspection | Service name and type, date, who carried it out, how long, what you looked at (observation, records, conversations) and any limits |
| 2. Overall summary | Three or four sentences: what is working, the main risks and your overall mock rating |
| 3. Findings by key question | For each of Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led: the score from your scoring sheet, what you saw, what evidence supports it, and what is missing |
| 4. Regulations at risk | List each gap against the regulation it would fall under (for example Regulation 12 or 17), with the evidence and why it matters |
| 5. Recommendations and action plan | Each action with an owner, due date and how you will prove it is complete (use the action plan template above) |
| 6. Summary for people and staff | A plain-language summary you can share with people using the service, families and staff, and an easy read version where needed |
| 7. Sign-off and re-check | Who reviewed it, the date and when the mock will be repeated |
Writing good findings. State what you saw, link it to evidence and say why it matters. Instead of “Care plans are not up to date”, write “Four of six care plans sampled had no review since the person’s fall (dates), so staff would not know the changed mobility needs. Action: review all plans after any fall, owner: deputy manager, due 14 November.” Keep the language factual, and avoid copying CQC’s rating words unless your scoring supports them.
After a real assessment. CQC publishes the report on its website, and providers must display their ratings (displaying your CQC rating). CQC offers PowerPoint poster templates for services assessed under its new approach, which you can download from its ratings poster pages.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a CQC mock inspection template?
A structured form for testing your own service the way CQC would. It covers the five key questions and quality statements, lists what to check and what evidence to see, records a score and ends in an action plan.
Is there a free CQC mock inspection template?
Yes. This page contains a complete template you can copy into Word or Excel or print: a set-up sheet, a scoring method, a check for all 34 quality statements, a walk-round checklist, a records sampling guide and an action plan.
How do I do a mock CQC inspection?
Choose an independent inspector, complete the set-up sheet, review records, observe the service, talk to people and staff, score each quality statement 1 to 4, calculate totals per key question, agree an action plan with owners and dates, and re-check within a month.
How do I score a mock inspection?
Score each quality statement 1 to 4 as CQC does. Add the scores for a key question, divide by the maximum (statements multiplied by 4) and compare with CQC’s thresholds: 63% or more is Good. Any score of 1 limits Good to Requires Improvement.
What should a mock inspection checklist include?
A set-up sheet, document and record review, observation of the environment and staff practice, conversations with people and staff, scoring against the quality statements, and an action plan with owners and deadlines.
How often should you do a mock inspection?
Quarterly is a practical rhythm for a full check, with monthly spot checks in weaker areas and a fresh check after any significant incident or change of manager. This is our suggestion, not a CQC rule.
Who should carry out a mock inspection?
Someone independent of the area being checked, such as a manager from another service, a quality lead or an external consultant, so that scoring is objective.
How much does a CQC mock inspection cost?
Doing it yourself costs staff time. External providers set their own prices based on size and scope, so ask for a written scope. One self-completion toolkit was advertised at £400 plus VAT in October 2026.
What does a mock inspection mean?
A practice inspection you run to simulate a CQC assessment and find gaps before CQC does. It is an internal exercise only.
What is the difference between a mock and a real CQC inspection?
A real assessment is carried out by CQC, uses evidence from all six categories including partners and the public, and results in a rating. A mock is internal, uses your own evidence and has no regulatory effect.
Does the template work for home care?
Yes. The scoring and key questions are the same. Add environmental and health and safety risk assessments, emergency arrangements, call monitoring, skill mix and a visit observation.
What do I do with the results?
Hold a debrief, share the findings with staff, complete the action plan with owners and dates, and re-check anything scored 1 or 2 within a month.
Is there an official CQC inspection report template?
CQC does not publish a blank report template for providers because it writes the report itself, and the lead inspector writes it. You can model a mock inspection report on the structure CQC reports follow: context, findings by key question, ratings, breaches, recommendations and a summary for people using the service.
What is in a CQC inspection report?
According to CQC, adult social care reports include information about the service and inspection, the team’s findings, ratings for each key question inspected and the overall rating, evidence of any breaches and enforcement, recommendations to the provider, and a summary section to share with people using the service, families, carers and staff.
How do I write a mock CQC inspection report?
Use the report template on this page: about the mock inspection, overall summary, findings and score for each key question, regulations at risk, recommendations with owners and dates, a summary for people and staff, and a sign-off with a re-check date. Make each finding specific and linked to evidence.
How do I write a CQC report?
CQC reports are written by CQC’s lead inspector, so providers do not write them. If you mean a report on your own mock inspection or audit, follow the structure above and keep findings factual and evidenced.